programming languages

Rank

Mozart-Oz

Based on 1921 responses from 155 people, this is the picture we've built up of Mozart-Oz.

Most dissimilar from...

  1. C
  2. C++
  3. Java
  4. Javascript
  5. PHP

All statements

  1. This language excels at concurrency
  2. This language is good for distributed computing
  3. Developers who primarily use this language often burn out after a few years
  4. The thought that I may still be using this language in twenty years time fills me with dread
  5. This is a high level language
  6. This language has unusual features that I often miss when using other languages
  7. I would use this language for a desktop GUI project
  8. This language excels at symbolic manipulation
  9. This language has a very rigid idea of how things should be done
  10. This language is well suited for an agile development approach using short iterations.
  11. Code written in this language tends to be very reliable
  12. I would use this language for writing server programs
  13. This language is likely to be a passing fad
  14. This language is expressive
  15. This language is very flexible
  16. This language is suitable for real-time applications
  17. This language is large
  18. I would like to write more of this language than I currently do
  19. The semantics of this language are much different than other languages I know.
  20. This language is likely to have a strong influence on future languages
  21. If this language didn't exist, I would have trouble finding a satisfactory replacement
  22. Code written in this language tends to be verbose
  23. This language has a very dogmatic community
  24. I still discover new features of this language on a fairly regular basis
  25. I would use this language for casual scripting
  26. I enjoy playing with this language but would never use it for "real code"
  27. Code written in this language will usually run in all the major implementations if it runs in one of them.
  28. Programs written in this language will usually work in future versions of the language
  29. Learning this language improved my ability as a programmer
  30. This language is minimal
  31. This language has an annoying syntax
  32. Learning this language significantly changed how I use other languages.
  33. I am reluctant to admit to knowing this language
  34. It is easy to debug programs written in this language when it goes wrong
  35. This language has a high quality implementation
  36. It's unusual for me to discover unfamiliar features
  37. This language is well documented
  38. I enjoy using this language
  39. This language encourages writing reusable code.
  40. This language encourages writing code that is easy to maintain.
  41. I learned this language early in my career as a programmer
  42. I would recommend most programmers learn this language, regardless of whether they have a specific need for it
  43. This language matches it's problem domain particularly well.
  44. This language has a good library distribution mechanism.
  45. I rarely have difficulty abstracting patterns I find in my code
  46. This language has well-organized libraries with consistent, carefully thought-out interfaces
  47. I would use this language for a web project
  48. This language has a very coherent design
  49. This language is built on a small core of orthogonal features
  50. This is a low level language
  51. I often get angry when writing code in this language
  52. This language excels at text processing
  53. This language has many features which feel "tacked on"
  54. If my code in this language successfully compiles, there is a good chance my code is correct.
  55. It is easy to tell at a glance what code in this language does
  56. Code written in this language tends to be terse
  57. I find this language easy to prototype in
  58. This language is good for beginners
  59. I use this language out of choice
  60. This language is good for scientific computing
  61. I often write things in this language with the intent of rewriting them in something else later
  62. This language would be good for teaching children to write software
  63. This language has a niche in which it is great
  64. I usually use this language on solo projects
  65. I often feel like I am not smart enough to write this language
  66. I find code written in this language very elegant
  67. This language is easier to use for it's problem domain by removing unneeded expressiveness (such as not being Turing complete).
  68. This language has a strong static type system
  69. This language makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot
  70. There are many good open-source tools for this language
  71. This language allows me to write programs where I know exactly what they are doing under the hood
  72. There is a lot of accidental complexity when writing code in this language
  73. There are many good tools for this language
  74. Libraries in this language tend to be well documented.
  75. Writing code in this language is a lot of work
  76. There are many good commercial tools for this language
  77. It is too easy to write code in this language that looks like it does one thing but actually does something else
  78. Programs written in this language tend to play well with others
  79. Code written in this language is very readable
  80. This language has a niche outside of which I would not use it
  81. This language is frequently used for applications it isn't suitable for
  82. I regularly use this language
  83. I am sometimes embarrassed to admit to my peers that I know this language
  84. This language is unusually bad for beginners
  85. This language is best for very small projects
  86. When I run into problems my colleagues can provide me with immediate help with this language
  87. This language is best for very large projects
  88. Programs written in this language tend to be efficient
  89. This language has a wide variety of agreed-upon conventions, which are generally adhered to reasonably well, and which increase my productivity
  90. I would use this language as a scripting language embedded inside a larger application
  91. When I write code in this language I can be very sure it is correct
  92. I can imagine using this language in my day job
  93. I would use this language for writing programs for an embedded hardware platform
  94. I would use this language for mobile applications
  95. There is a wide variety of open source code written in this language
  96. I find it easy to write efficient code in this language
  97. This language is good for numeric computing
  98. The resources for learning this language are of high quality
  99. This is a mainstream language
  100. I can imagine this will be a popular language in twenty years time
  101. I would use this language to write a command-line app
  102. I usually use this language on projects with many other members
  103. I would list this language on my resume
  104. This language has a good community
  105. I know this language well
  106. Third-party libraries are readily available, well-documented, and of high quality
  107. This language is likely to be around for a very long time
  108. I use many applications written in this language
  109. I know many other people who use this language