programming languages

Rank

Shell vs Haskell

  1. This is a mainstream language

    88% 12%
    Shell 60 out of 68 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  2. This language makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot

    86% 14%
    Shell 66 out of 76 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  3. The thought that I may still be using this language in twenty years time fills me with dread

    86% 14%
    Shell 57 out of 66 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  4. I would use this language for casual scripting

    83% 17%
    Shell 67 out of 80 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  5. It is too easy to write code in this language that looks like it does one thing but actually does something else

    83% 17%
    Shell 51 out of 61 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  6. This language is frequently used for applications it isn't suitable for

    83% 17%
    Shell 55 out of 66 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  7. This language has an annoying syntax

    82% 18%
    Shell 48 out of 58 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  8. I often get angry when writing code in this language

    82% 18%
    Shell 42 out of 51 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  9. This language has a niche outside of which I would not use it

    82% 18%
    Shell 41 out of 50 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  10. Code written in this language tends to be verbose

    80% 20%
    Shell 45 out of 56 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  11. I know many other people who use this language

    80% 20%
    Shell 61 out of 76 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  12. This language is easier to use for it's problem domain by removing unneeded expressiveness (such as not being Turing complete).

    80% 20%
    Shell 20 out of 25 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  13. There is a lot of accidental complexity when writing code in this language

    79% 21%
    Shell 35 out of 44 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  14. I use many applications written in this language

    79% 21%
    Shell 57 out of 72 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  15. I learned this language early in my career as a programmer

    79% 21%
    Shell 53 out of 67 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  16. I use a lot of code written in this language which I really don't want to have to make changes to

    75% 25%
    Shell 22 out of 29 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  17. Programs written in this language tend to play well with others

    73% 27%
    Shell 34 out of 46 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  18. This language is best for very small projects

    73% 27%
    Shell 48 out of 65 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  19. When I run into problems my colleagues can provide me with immediate help with this language

    72% 28%
    Shell 43 out of 59 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  20. I am reluctant to admit to knowing this language

    72% 28%
    Shell 47 out of 65 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  21. Developers who primarily use this language often burn out after a few years

    69% 31%
    Shell 30 out of 43 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  22. This language has many features which feel "tacked on"

    69% 31%
    Shell 48 out of 69 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  23. I am sometimes embarrassed to admit to my peers that I know this language

    68% 32%
    Shell 32 out of 47 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  24. I usually use this language on projects with many other members

    67% 33%
    Shell 31 out of 46 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  25. I often write things in this language with the intent of rewriting them in something else later

    67% 33%
    Shell 41 out of 61 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  26. This language is likely to be around for a very long time

    66% 34%
    Shell 52 out of 78 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  27. I regularly use this language

    65% 35%
    Shell 54 out of 82 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  28. This language allows me to write programs where I know exactly what they are doing under the hood

    56% 44%
    Shell 43 out of 76 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  29. I know this language well

    56% 44%
    Shell 417 out of 739 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  30. I can imagine using this language in my day job

    56% 44%
    Shell 40 out of 71 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  31. It's unusual for me to discover unfamiliar features

    54% 46%
    Shell 20 out of 37 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  32. This is a low level language

    53% 47%
    Shell 37 out of 69 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  33. Programs written in this language will usually work in future versions of the language

    53% 47%
    Shell 31 out of 58 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  34. This language excels at text processing

    53% 47%
    Shell 32 out of 60 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  35. There are many good commercial tools for this language

    52% 48%
    Shell 28 out of 53 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  36. This language is unusually bad for beginners

    52% 48%
    Shell 32 out of 61 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  37. I would use this language to write a command-line app

    52% 48%
    Shell 35 out of 67 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  38. There is a wide variety of open source code written in this language

    51% 49%
    Shell 32 out of 62 picked Shell over Haskell Haskell

  39. I would use this language as a scripting language embedded inside a larger application

    49% 51%
    Shell 33 out of 65 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  40. Writing code in this language is a lot of work

    47% 53%
    Shell 36 out of 69 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  41. I find this language easy to prototype in

    45% 55%
    Shell 39 out of 72 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  42. This language is minimal

    45% 55%
    Shell 44 out of 81 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  43. This language has a niche in which it is great

    45% 55%
    Shell 31 out of 57 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  44. This language matches it's problem domain particularly well.

    42% 58%
    Shell 33 out of 57 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  45. There are many good open-source tools for this language

    42% 58%
    Shell 40 out of 69 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  46. It is easy to tell at a glance what code in this language does

    38% 62%
    Shell 33 out of 54 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  47. It is easy to debug programs written in this language when it goes wrong

    38% 62%
    Shell 34 out of 55 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  48. This language is good for beginners

    36% 64%
    Shell 44 out of 69 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  49. I enjoy playing with this language but would never use it for "real code"

    35% 65%
    Shell 36 out of 56 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  50. This language is well suited for an agile development approach using short iterations.

    34% 66%
    Shell 38 out of 58 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  51. If this language didn't exist, I would have trouble finding a satisfactory replacement

    34% 66%
    Shell 56 out of 85 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  52. This language is well documented

    33% 67%
    Shell 38 out of 57 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  53. This language would be good for teaching children to write software

    31% 69%
    Shell 40 out of 58 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  54. I would use this language for mobile applications

    29% 71%
    Shell 46 out of 65 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  55. This language is large

    28% 72%
    Shell 54 out of 75 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  56. I usually use this language on solo projects

    27% 73%
    Shell 53 out of 73 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  57. I would list this language on my resume

    27% 73%
    Shell 64 out of 88 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  58. Code written in this language will usually run in all the major implementations if it runs in one of them.

    26% 74%
    Shell 36 out of 49 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  59. This language is likely to be a passing fad

    26% 74%
    Shell 37 out of 50 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  60. I find it easy to write efficient code in this language

    25% 75%
    Shell 55 out of 74 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  61. This language has a very rigid idea of how things should be done

    25% 75%
    Shell 47 out of 63 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  62. This language is very flexible

    25% 75%
    Shell 45 out of 60 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  63. There are many good tools for this language

    24% 76%
    Shell 43 out of 57 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  64. I would use this language for writing programs for an embedded hardware platform

    23% 77%
    Shell 59 out of 77 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  65. I use this language out of choice

    23% 77%
    Shell 56 out of 73 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  66. I can imagine this will be a popular language in twenty years time

    23% 77%
    Shell 53 out of 69 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  67. I would use this language for a desktop GUI project

    21% 79%
    Shell 44 out of 56 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  68. Third-party libraries are readily available, well-documented, and of high quality

    21% 79%
    Shell 52 out of 66 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  69. This language is suitable for real-time applications

    21% 79%
    Shell 56 out of 71 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  70. This language is good for distributed computing

    19% 81%
    Shell 44 out of 55 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  71. This language has a very dogmatic community

    19% 81%
    Shell 37 out of 46 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  72. Code written in this language is very readable

    19% 81%
    Shell 54 out of 67 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  73. This language has a wide variety of agreed-upon conventions, which are generally adhered to reasonably well, and which increase my productivity

    19% 81%
    Shell 38 out of 47 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  74. Code written in this language tends to be terse

    18% 82%
    Shell 57 out of 70 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  75. I would recommend most programmers learn this language, regardless of whether they have a specific need for it

    18% 82%
    Shell 59 out of 72 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  76. This is a high level language

    17% 83%
    Shell 60 out of 73 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  77. The resources for learning this language are of high quality

    17% 83%
    Shell 47 out of 57 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  78. I would use this language for a web project

    15% 85%
    Shell 55 out of 65 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  79. The semantics of this language are much different than other languages I know.

    15% 85%
    Shell 56 out of 66 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  80. This language has a good community

    14% 86%
    Shell 46 out of 54 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  81. This language has a high quality implementation

    12% 88%
    Shell 54 out of 62 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  82. I would use this language for writing server programs

    12% 88%
    Shell 54 out of 62 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  83. I still discover new features of this language on a fairly regular basis

    12% 88%
    Shell 65 out of 74 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  84. This language is best for very large projects

    12% 88%
    Shell 51 out of 58 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  85. I rarely have difficulty abstracting patterns I find in my code

    12% 88%
    Shell 44 out of 50 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  86. This language is built on a small core of orthogonal features

    11% 89%
    Shell 45 out of 51 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  87. I enjoy using this language

    11% 89%
    Shell 70 out of 79 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  88. This language encourages writing code that is easy to maintain.

    10% 90%
    Shell 51 out of 57 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  89. This language has well-organized libraries with consistent, carefully thought-out interfaces

    10% 90%
    Shell 61 out of 68 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  90. This language has a very coherent design

    9% 91%
    Shell 64 out of 71 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  91. This language excels at symbolic manipulation

    9% 91%
    Shell 48 out of 53 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  92. Libraries in this language tend to be well documented.

    8% 92%
    Shell 52 out of 57 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  93. This language excels at concurrency

    8% 92%
    Shell 54 out of 59 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  94. This language is good for scientific computing

    7% 93%
    Shell 47 out of 51 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  95. I would like to write more of this language than I currently do

    7% 93%
    Shell 72 out of 78 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  96. This language has a good library distribution mechanism.

    7% 93%
    Shell 51 out of 55 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  97. If my code in this language successfully compiles, there is a good chance my code is correct.

    7% 93%
    Shell 64 out of 69 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  98. Programs written in this language tend to be efficient

    7% 93%
    Shell 66 out of 71 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  99. Code written in this language tends to be very reliable

    7% 93%
    Shell 66 out of 71 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  100. This language has unusual features that I often miss when using other languages

    5% 95%
    Shell 80 out of 85 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  101. This language is expressive

    5% 95%
    Shell 70 out of 74 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  102. Learning this language significantly changed how I use other languages.

    5% 95%
    Shell 71 out of 75 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  103. Learning this language improved my ability as a programmer

    4% 96%
    Shell 58 out of 61 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  104. This language encourages writing reusable code.

    3% 97%
    Shell 49 out of 51 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  105. This language has a strong static type system

    3% 97%
    Shell 58 out of 60 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  106. This language is likely to have a strong influence on future languages

    2% 98%
    Shell 73 out of 75 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  107. I often feel like I am not smart enough to write this language

    2% 98%
    Shell 39 out of 40 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  108. I find code written in this language very elegant

    1% 99%
    Shell 75 out of 76 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  109. This language is good for numeric computing

    100%
    Shell 67 out of 67 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

  110. When I write code in this language I can be very sure it is correct

    100%
    Shell 67 out of 67 picked Haskell over Shell Haskell

What's going on here?

The absolute rankings are interesting for large scale comparisons but when you want to know about two specific languages it's much more informative to look at how the two fare when they go directly head to head.

Here are all the statements which we've got enough comparisons between Shell and Haskell to be meaningful and which of the two our users picked.

The order in which we're presenting them is a little arbitrary (sorry), but we've tried to put the things which they're both good at first so as to give you the most interesting picture of it.